A pair of Iowa State wide receiver commits in the 2026 class debuted as four-star prospects in the newly released Rivals300 ...

Ames had sued the Ohio Department of Youth Services in November 2020, alleging that she was wrongfully denied a promotion in favor of a lesbian who was not qualified for the role.

The significance of Supreme Court's ruling in reverse discrimination case 01:29. Washington — The Supreme Court on Thursday revived a lawsuit from an Ohio woman who claimed she was the victim of ...

Supreme Court unanimously rules in favor of an Ohio woman who claimed workplace discrimination, finding that majority groups in protected classes don't need to meet higher evidentiary standards in ...

Marlean Ames in her lawyer's office in Akron, OH on February 20, 2025. Maddie McGarvey/For The Washington Post via Getty Images.

Ames twice lost jobs at the Ohio Department of Youth Services to other candidates she thought were less qualified, both of whom were gay. The department said she was passed over for a promotion ...

In a landmark decision on June 5, the U.S. Supreme Court in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services struck down the Sixth Circuit’s “background circumstances” rule, ...

In 2020, Marlean Ames alleged that she was denied a job promotion and subsequently demoted by the Ohio Department of Youth Services because she is heterosexual. Her supervisor at the time was gay ...

Marlean Ames, a heterosexual woman, was employed by the Ohio Department of Youth Services (DYS) since 2004 and was promoted to Administrator of the Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA) in 2014.

Ames had sued the Ohio Department of Youth Services in November 2020, alleging that she was wrongfully denied a promotion in favor of a lesbian who was not qualified for the role and then demoted ...

Ames twice lost jobs at the Ohio Department of Youth Services to other candidates she thought were less qualified, both of whom were gay. The department said she was passed over for a promotion ...

During the court’s discussion of the case in February, Ohio’s solicitor general did not defend the “exact language” the Cincinnati-based 6 th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals used when rejecting Ames’ ...