The Supreme Court ruled that federal law limits state lawsuits on pesticide labels, a win for Tennessee farmers.
After a major Supreme Court win for Bayer, the EPA approved or expanded six controversial pesticides, drawing fierce backlash.
6don MSNOpinion
MAHA’s Supreme Court setback
Last month, the Supreme Court sided with the maker of Roundup weed killer in a case that has revealed limits of the MAHA ...
The Trump Administration's MAHA policies contradict what many in the MAHA movement truly want: a glyphosate-free nation ...
The Supreme Court has finally issued its highly anticipated decision in Monsanto v. Durnell, and the result is a major setback for consumers. People are right to be frustrated by the court’s decision, ...
Updated on June 25 at 5:59 p.m. The Supreme Court on Thursday sided with Monsanto in a high-stakes dispute over cancer warnings on pesticide labels. In an opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh in ...
A new push in Congress challenges the SCOTUS ruling that protects pesticide firms from liability over missing warning labels.
The Supreme Court on Thursday restricted Americans’ ability to sue pesticide makers over alleged health harms stemming from their products. In a 7-2 ruling, the court held that some claims that ...
Opinion
22don MSNOpinion
Supreme Court bars states from protecting consumers if federal agencies won’t
Chemical giant Monsanto has argued for years that if the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approves a pesticide label without requiring a cancer warning, states cannot hold its manufacturer liable ...
The Supreme Court’s Roundup ruling keeps a single Missouri courtroom from setting the rules for every weedkiller sold in the ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results